Why a video beats a list of buttons
A bio page competes with a feed, not with other websites. Motion is the only thing on the page that can win that comparison.

Someone taps your bio link from inside an app that is engineered to keep them. They were watching something a second ago. Whatever loads next is judged against that, not against other link pages.
A stack of grey buttons loses that comparison instantly. Not because it is ugly, but because it asks the visitor to switch modes: from watching to reading, from being entertained to making a decision. Every mode switch costs you people.
Motion holds the half-second you get
The first half-second decides whether someone reads a single label. A page that is already moving when it appears carries the visitor's attention across the gap instead of asking them to re-engage. That is the entire argument for putting video behind your links.
It does not need to be a new clip. The clip you already posted to a story works, because it does the same job it did there: it establishes that a person is on the other side of this page. A face and a movement communicate "this is mine" faster than any header image or logo.
What actually plays
Three constraints, all boring, all decisive:
- Vertical. The page is opened on a phone essentially always. A landscape clip letterboxed into a portrait screen wastes the two thirds of the frame that hold attention.
- Silent. Autoplay is muted, so the clip has to read with no sound. If your video needs audio to make sense, it is the wrong clip.
- Short and loopable. Six to fifteen seconds. A loop that restarts cleanly is worth more than a longer clip that cuts hard, because most visitors will see the seam.
The other half of this is legibility. Video behind text is a contrast problem: a bright clip makes white labels vanish. That is what an overlay control is for. Darken until the buttons are unambiguous, then stop. If you find yourself pushing the overlay past about 70% to make text readable, the clip is too busy and no amount of darkening will fix it.
Where video is the wrong call
It is not a universal answer.
If your page exists to route existing customers to a support form, motion is friction. They know what they want and video delays it. If your audience is mostly on desktop, the case weakens. And if the only clip you have is stock footage of a city at night, use a still: an obviously generic video is worse than no video, because it signals that nobody was home.
The measurement that settles it
You do not have to take any of this on belief. Publish the page with a clip for two weeks, then swap the clip for a still poster for two weeks, posting at your normal cadence in both. Compare the share of visitors who tapped anything.
That is a real test with a real answer for your audience, and it takes a month. Most advice about bio pages, including this post, is a hypothesis until you run it.